Effects of Facebook Brand Marketing on Millennials

Exploring
the Effects of Brand Marketing via Facebook on Purchasing Behaviors of
Millennials

 Millennials, also known as
Generation Y, typically refer to the population born from 1980 to 1994 (some
say 2000), almost all of whom have come into adulthood by today. Not only do
millennials consist of more than 25% (75 million) of the U.S. population
(Berger, 2016, p.103), they also possess the tremendous annual purchasing power
of $200 billion (Solomon, 2015, par.3). As millennials dominate the whole
consumer population of the U.S., they have become the targets and chief
subjects of analysis by marketers. Although some might argue that the
characteristics of millennials are the general features exhibited by young
people, most scholars have agreed on the existence of cohort effects of
millennials. Schawbel (2015) argued that they seem not to be influenced at all
by advertising (par. 2), but in the meantime purchasing an enormous amount of similar
“in trend” merchandizes with their peers, including clothes, technology
products, food and et cetera. According to Walker (2008), a major question to
ask by marketers is, “how do we square this marketing-resistant generation with
another point that the experts always make: that many members of Generation Y
demand the toniest designer clothes, the best cell phones, the most complex
lattes?” (p.103).

Millennials are too versatile to be analyzed easily, and part of the
reason is that their multicultural identities have made them more complex than
the generations before them. A Nielsen report published in 2017 shows that 42%
of the millennial cohort population has multicultural heritage, or are
ambicultural (p.3). With their multicultural heritage, along with being exposed
to a diversity of cultures on a regular basis, millennials not only developed a
broad, unique purchasing habit, but are also influencing the buying decisions
of their peers and family profoundly.

When making purchasing decisions, millennials pay a tremendous amount of time and attention choosing the brands that they align their own identities with. A study by the Keller Fay Group released in 2007 claimed that millennials have roughly 145 conversations about brands a week (versus the public average level of 71). Among these conversations, 77 brands are mentioned on average. In addition, brand mentions by millennials are three times as likely to be via digital media and 57% of them cites marketing or media material(p.4) Consumer behaviors have conventionally been disseminated by television, radio and newspapers, but in the twenty-first century, social media has begun to replace traditional media’s enduring and influential role on millennials consumers. Like Uitz (2012) argued, this phenomenon puts forward both an opportunity and a challenge from a marketer’s perspective (p.5).

 Reacting to the rapid growth and prevalence of social media among millennials, marketers are tirelessly planting advertisements, brand profiles and sponsored contents onto platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, YouTube and Twitter to promote sales. According to Yaakop et al., implementing content that is captivating and relevant drives millennial consumers to communicate with each other and advertise the information to their friends (p.155). This process, also known as word-of-mouth (WOM), is not only the future of social media marketing communications, but also the key phenomenon that marketers are aiming to probe into.

     Past researches have proven the crucial
role of Facebook to social media marketers. According to Raice (2012),
customers spend between 3.5 and 6 hours daily on Google, YouTube or Facebook,
with Facebook having the most time spent at 6 hours average for the user
(par.4). Reacting to this astonishing time commitment, brands have invested
heavily on Facebook advertising, trying to make their content seen and engaged
by users. Advertising spending on Facebook has risen from 1.87 billion to 3.15
billion in merely one year in 2010 (Advertising Age Staff, 2012). In his work,
Eisenberg (2009) points out that surveys show that millennials spend more time
online than they do with radio, television, and print, which helps explain why
advertisers are so interested in online advertising and why the money
advertisers spend for online advertising has been growing so substantially
(p.103). Instead of banner ads, Facebook advertisements either appear on the
side column of users’ news feed or in between two posts and usually include
images of the merchandizes and purchase links. Nowadays, more and more Facebook
advertisements are strategically matched with the users’ search history on
Google or online shopping sites by algorithm, in order to maximize
click-through rate (CTR). Besides, more and more businesses are allocating
large budgets on the establishments and operations of brands Facebook pages,
where users are able to stay up-to-date of discounts, new arrivals, events
information and et cetera. As Jones et al. (2009) found, Millennials and
younger generations carry the internet with them and feel at a loss if not
tuned in to what is happening with friends, celebrities, or favorite retailers
(par.7). Facebook is able to influence users’ purchase decisions by utilizing
their social network – showing them which friends liked certain brands and what
brands influencers and celebrities are currently liking.

While all the data points to millennials and Facebook as paramount and
inseparable subjects of investigation, existing studies are lacking and
unfruitful in providing a comprehensive theoretical viewpoint of Facebook being
utilized as a tool of social media marketing among millennials. Okazaki and
Taylor (2013) reported that it was because it took time and was a cumulative
process to develop theoretical foundations (p.58). Bolton et al. (2013) agreed
and added that that few studies assessed whether there were differences within
a separate cohort (p.247). As discussed above, millennials have unique
purchasing behaviors generated partly from their multicultural identities, and
therefore studies investigating millennials specifically are in need. Besides,
Bolton et al. (2013) pointed out that past studies have focused chiefly on
student population and overlooked the fact that a considerable percentage of
millennials have entered the workspace and altered their purchasing behaviors
accordingly (p.247). Furthermore, past researches focused on attitudes towards Facebook
marketing have yielded different conclusions on the topic. Bannister et al.
(2013) concluded that attitudes towards Facebook marketing communications were
negative or indifferent, whereas Chandra et al. (2012) found a significantly
positive behavioral propensity.

Consequently, this study seeks to explore the following research
questions: Firstly, what is the attitude of millennials towards brand marketing
via Facebook? Secondly, what impact does brand marketing through Facebook have
on millennials intention-to-purchase? Thirdly, what effect does engagement with
Facebook (time spent, level of activity, number of friends and public accounts
followed) have on brand purchase decisions of millennials? Last but not least,
what roles do demographic factors (race, gender and et cetera) play in
millennials’ brand purchases driven by Facebook brand marketing?

References

Advertising Age Staff. (2012). Where have the first
quarter ad dollars gone. Advertising Age.
Retrieved from: http://adage.com/article/media/quarter-ad-dollars/233706/.

Bannister, A., Kiefer,
J. and Nellums, J. (2013). College students’ perceptions of and behaviours regarding Facebook advertising:
an exploratory study, The Catalyst, (3)1, 1-20.

Berger, A. (2016). Marketing and American Consumer Culture: A
Cultural Studies Analysis.

Bolton, R.N.,
Parasuraman, A., Hoefnagels, A., Migchels, N., Kabadayi, S., Gruber, T., Loureiro, Y.K. and Solnet, D. (2013). Understanding Generation Y and
their use of social media: a review
and research agenda, Journal of Service Management, (24)3, 245-267.

Chandra, B., Goswami, S.
and Chouhan, V. (2012). Investigating attitude towards online advertising on social
media – an empirical study, Management Insight, (8)1, 1-14.

Eisenberg, L.
(2009). Shoptimism: Why the American consumer will keep on buying no
matter what. New York: Free Press.

Jones, S, Johnson-Yale,
C, Millermaier, S, and Perez, F. (2009). Everyday life, online: U.S. college
students’ use of the internet. First Monday, 14.(10-5)

Keller Fay Group. (2007).  ‘Word of Mouth’ Winners Among Teens: iPod,
American Eagle, Dr Pepper, Chevrolet and Nintendo. Wireless News, 1.

Okazaki, S. and Taylor,
R.T. (2013). Social media and international advertising: theoretical challenges
and future directions. International Marketing Review, (30)1, 56-71.

Raice, S. (2012). Days of wild user growth appear over at Facebook. Wall
Street Journal On-line. Retrieved from: https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303296604577454970244896342

Schawbel, D. (2015). 10
New Findings About The Millennial Consumer. Forbes. Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danschawbel/2015/01/20/10-new-findings-about-the-millennial-consumer/#2c512b616c8f

Solomon, M. (2015). The
Millennial Customer Has $200 Billion To Spend (But Wants A New Style Of
Customer Service). Forbes. Retrieved from:

The Nielsen Company. (2017). Multicultural
Millennials: The Multiplier Effect. Retrieved from: http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports/2017/multicultural-millennials–the-multiplier-effect.html

Uitz, I. (2012). Social media:
is it worth the trouble?, Journal of Internet Social Networking and Virtual
Communities, 1-14.

Walker, R. (2009). Buying in: What we buy and who we are.
Random House Trade Paperbacks.

Yaakop, A., Anuar, M. M., & Omar, K. (2013). Like it or not: issue
of credibility in Facebook advertising. Asian Social Science, 9(3),
154-163.